No, Spotify will not ban AI-generated music. CEO Daniel Ek has confirmed in interviews that the platform will take a "nuanced approach" rather than prohibit AI music outright. The September 2025 policy update reinforced this position while cracking down on spam and impersonation. Legitimate AI music created with commercial rights and proper disclosure remains welcome on the platform.

Spotify's official stance: "We're not here to punish artists for using AI authentically and responsibly. We hope that artists' use of AI production tools will enable them to be more creative than ever."

Why Spotify Won't Ban AI Music

Several business and practical factors make a full AI ban unlikely:

Revenue model: Spotify earns from all streams regardless of how the music was created. Banning AI music would reduce catalog size and listening options without benefiting their bottom line.

Competitive pressure: If Spotify banned AI music while Apple Music, YouTube, and Amazon Music allowed it, creators would simply distribute elsewhere. Deezer has taken a more restrictive approach by labeling and downranking AI music, but even they haven't banned it outright.

Human-AI integration: Many commercially successful artists already use AI tools in production. Warner Music executives have openly discussed their artists using AI, making any prohibition impractical.

Functional music demand: Listeners genuinely want AI-generated ambient, focus, and workout music. This category fills real user needs that human creators often underserve.

What the 75 Million Track Removal Actually Means

Headlines about Spotify removing 75 million tracks created panic among AI music creators. The context matters:

What Was Removed	What Wasn't Removed
Mass-uploaded spam	Quality AI compositions
Duplicate content farms	Original AI music with commercial rights
Artificially short tracks	Full-length AI songs
SEO manipulation attempts	Properly disclosed AI music
Fake stream schemes	Legitimate AI artists building audiences

The removal targeted uploaders exploiting AI tools for volume, not creators using AI for genuine music production. Spotify's Sam Duboff noted that fully AI-generated tracks represent "a small percentage of streams" and tend to be "low quality" when minimal effort goes into creation.

What Actually Gets Restricted

Spotify's September 2025 policy established specific restrictions rather than blanket bans:

Voice cloning without consent: Tracks using AI to replicate a real artist's voice require documented authorization from that artist. The viral "Heart On My Sleeve" track that cloned Drake and The Weeknd prompted this policy.

Spam tactics: Mass uploads, duplicates, and artificially short tracks trigger the new spam filter. Flagged uploaders get removed from algorithmic recommendations or the platform entirely.

Missing disclosure: While not currently mandatory, false AI disclosures can result in distribution delays or removal.

What Is the Policy Evolution Timeline?

Date	Development
April 2023	"Heart On My Sleeve" viral deepfake prompts industry discussion
September 2023	Ek confirms no AI ban, announces "nuanced approach"
Throughout 2024-2025	Quiet removal of spam content accelerates
September 2025	Official policy update with DDEX disclosure standard

Each step moved toward regulation, not prohibition. The trend suggests continued refinement of rules rather than any shift toward banning AI music.

What This Means for AI Creators

If you're creating AI music with commercial rights and genuine creative intent, Spotify's policies shouldn't concern you. The platform is targeting:

Bad actors gaming the royalty system
Voice impersonation without consent
Content farms flooding the catalog

Creators who treat AI as a production tool rather than a spam generator face no risk from current or anticipated policies.

Note Spotify treats AI use as "a spectrum, not a binary." Using AI for some elements while contributing human creativity puts you firmly in the allowed category.

What Should AI Creators Be Looking Ahead For?

Future policy changes will likely focus on:

Expanding DDEX disclosure requirements
Improving spam detection accuracy
Clarifying voice licensing standards
Possible algorithmic treatment differences for fully AI-generated content

None of these point toward a ban. Spotify has too much to lose from restricting a growing category of content and too little to gain from policing the creative tools artists use. The trajectory is toward transparency and quality standards, not prohibition.