Directly paying curators for a slot is modern payola. Platforms prohibit it, distributors can remove your music, and the data it creates hurts your future reach. Use ethical options instead.
Short answer: No. Do not pay for playlist placement. It's the streaming-era version of payola: undisclosed consideration for editorial exposure. Major platforms prohibit it, distributors routinely remove tracks tied to manipulation, and the "streams" it buys tend to tank your save rate and spike skips, which reduces your future algorithmic reach.
What the platforms actually say
Platform
Policy stance
Risk called out
Spotify
Warns against third-party services that guarantee streams or sell placements
Prohibits inauthentic activity that manipulates distribution
Account or content penalties
Bottom line: if money changes hands for placement, you’re in policy-violation territory, even when a middleman calls it “promotion.”
Why it backfires (beyond the rules)
Algorithm damage: Paid slots often deliver mismatched listeners. You'll see low completion, high skips, low saves, signals recommendation systems use to reduce your reach on Release-type and Radio/Autoplay surfaces.
Account risk: Distributors can takedown tracks, block catalog deliveries, or claw back earnings when manipulation is detected.
Bad data compounding: Your future targeting gets worse if the last release filled your audience graph with the wrong listeners or suspected bots.
“Gray area” claims, decoded
Pitch
What it often means
Risk
“We don’t sell placement, we sell access to curators.”
Curators are being compensated to add tracks.
Still payola-like, still risky.
"Review fees only, no guarantee."
Curator is paid to consider your song with an implied quid-pro-quo.
Triggers the same fraud filters if outcomes correlate with payments.
“Guaranteed followers/plays”
Botted or incentivized activity.
Removals, withheld royalties, shadow penalties.
If a service can guarantee an outcome that an editorial decision or listener behavior should determine, assume policy risk.
Legal and ethical context (quick)
Broadcast payola in the U.S. is addressed by sponsorship-identification laws (e.g., FCC rules requiring disclosure of consideration for airplay). While playlists are not FCC-regulated broadcasts, undisclosed paid editorial contradicts the same principle, hence platform bans. See: FCC sponsorship identification rules.
Ethical ways to get heard (that actually help your data)
Pitch editorial the right way
Use each platform’s tools (e.g., Spotify for Artists for unreleased tracks). No guarantees, but it’s policy-safe and preserves data integrity.
Run real ads to real people
Use Meta/YouTube/TikTok ads that link to a smart link or your profile. Optimize for saves/follows instead of vanity clicks. This builds the right audience graph for future recommendation surfaces.
Creator marketing, not curator payments
Hire creators to make content (clearly labeled #ad). You’re paying for media, not a walled-garden editorial slot. Keep usage rights and UTMs per creator.
Policy-safe curator outreach
Use platforms that offer consideration and feedback (not guaranteed adds). You choose curators, they decide, and you see outcomes transparently.
FAQ
•
Updated
Should I pay for playlist placement?
Directly paying curators for a slot is modern payola. Platforms prohibit it, distributors can remove your music, and the data it creates hurts your future reach. Use ethical options instead.
Short answer: No. Do not pay for playlist placement. It's the streaming-era version of payola: undisclosed consideration for editorial exposure. Major platforms prohibit it, distributors routinely remove tracks tied to manipulation, and the "streams" it buys tend to tank your save rate and spike skips, which reduces your future algorithmic reach.
What the platforms actually say
Platform
Policy stance
Risk called out
Spotify
Warns against third-party services that guarantee streams or sell placements
Prohibits inauthentic activity that manipulates distribution
Account or content penalties
Bottom line: if money changes hands for placement, you’re in policy-violation territory, even when a middleman calls it “promotion.”
Why it backfires (beyond the rules)
Algorithm damage: Paid slots often deliver mismatched listeners. You'll see low completion, high skips, low saves, signals recommendation systems use to reduce your reach on Release-type and Radio/Autoplay surfaces.
Account risk: Distributors can takedown tracks, block catalog deliveries, or claw back earnings when manipulation is detected.
Bad data compounding: Your future targeting gets worse if the last release filled your audience graph with the wrong listeners or suspected bots.
“Gray area” claims, decoded
Pitch
What it often means
Risk
“We don’t sell placement, we sell access to curators.”
Curators are being compensated to add tracks.
Still payola-like, still risky.
"Review fees only, no guarantee."
Curator is paid to consider your song with an implied quid-pro-quo.
Triggers the same fraud filters if outcomes correlate with payments.
“Guaranteed followers/plays”
Botted or incentivized activity.
Removals, withheld royalties, shadow penalties.
If a service can guarantee an outcome that an editorial decision or listener behavior should determine, assume policy risk.
Legal and ethical context (quick)
Broadcast payola in the U.S. is addressed by sponsorship-identification laws (e.g., FCC rules requiring disclosure of consideration for airplay). While playlists are not FCC-regulated broadcasts, undisclosed paid editorial contradicts the same principle, hence platform bans. See: FCC sponsorship identification rules.
Ethical ways to get heard (that actually help your data)
Pitch editorial the right way
Use each platform’s tools (e.g., Spotify for Artists for unreleased tracks). No guarantees, but it’s policy-safe and preserves data integrity.
Run real ads to real people
Use Meta/YouTube/TikTok ads that link to a smart link or your profile. Optimize for saves/follows instead of vanity clicks. This builds the right audience graph for future recommendation surfaces.
Creator marketing, not curator payments
Hire creators to make content (clearly labeled #ad). You’re paying for media, not a walled-garden editorial slot. Keep usage rights and UTMs per creator.
Policy-safe curator outreach
Use platforms that offer consideration and feedback (not guaranteed adds). You choose curators, they decide, and you see outcomes transparently.
Data checklist (so you know it’s working)
Save rate in week one (primary KPI). If it’s below your median, stop spend and fix targeting or creative.
Completion and early skips. Rising completion with falling early skips = healthy fit.
Playlist position movement. If user playlists move you up the rows, that’s a strong signal to amplify with more content to that audience.
FAQ
Isn’t paying for a playlist the same as paying for an ad?
No. Ads buy labeled media inventory in open ad networks; playlist payola buys editorial influence in a closed ecosystem. Platforms ban the latter and expect the former to be transparent and properly disclosed.
What if a curator asks for a “tip” or “coffee” after adding my track?
If the payment is contingent on placement or implies continued favors, it’s risky. Decline and keep outreach professional and transparent.
Are “guaranteed placement” agencies ever legit?
If the guarantee involves editorial lists, no. If it's a guaranteed ad impression or creator post with disclosure, that's media buying, not a playlist slot, and is acceptable when done transparently.
Could I lose royalties?
Yes. Platforms and distributors can withhold or claw back earnings tied to artificial or policy-violating activity (see Spotify’s artificial streaming).
Data checklist (so you know it’s working)
Save rate in week one (primary KPI). If it’s below your median, stop spend and fix targeting or creative.
Completion and early skips. Rising completion with falling early skips = healthy fit.
Playlist position movement. If user playlists move you up the rows, that’s a strong signal to amplify with more content to that audience.
FAQ
Isn’t paying for a playlist the same as paying for an ad?
No. Ads buy labeled media inventory in open ad networks; playlist payola buys editorial influence in a closed ecosystem. Platforms ban the latter and expect the former to be transparent and properly disclosed.
What if a curator asks for a “tip” or “coffee” after adding my track?
If the payment is contingent on placement or implies continued favors, it’s risky. Decline and keep outreach professional and transparent.
Are “guaranteed placement” agencies ever legit?
If the guarantee involves editorial lists, no. If it's a guaranteed ad impression or creator post with disclosure, that's media buying, not a playlist slot, and is acceptable when done transparently.
Could I lose royalties?
Yes. Platforms and distributors can withhold or claw back earnings tied to artificial or policy-violating activity (see Spotify’s artificial streaming).
