Spotify–Sony Strike Global Deal With Direct U.S. Publishing

By Trevor Loucks
Founder & Lead Developer, DynamoiTrevor Loucks is the founder and lead developer of Dynamoi, where he leads coverage at the convergence of music business strategy and advertising technology. He focuses on applying the latest ad-tech techniques to artist and record label campaigns so they compound downstream music royalty growth. trevorloucks.com

Spotify and Sony Music Group signed new multi-year global licensing deals that span both recorded music and publishing. The publishing piece adds a direct U.S. license with Sony Music Publishing, moving beyond the MLC-administered compulsory system.
Why it matters:
A direct U.S. publishing deal lets Spotify and Sony align on pricing, products, and data without the friction of statutory mechanics. That can speed product rollouts (superfan tiers, hi‑res, enhanced visuals) and improve reporting fidelity for splits and advances.
For marketers and managers, it signals tighter commercial coordination between a major and the largest streamer—useful for windowing, pre‑saves, exclusive edits, and format experiments around live sessions, enhanced albums, or visual podcasts.
It also follows Spotify’s recent direct U.S. songs deal with Kobalt, suggesting a structural shift away from one‑size‑fits‑all compulsory licensing toward bespoke publisher agreements—with room for promotion levers and data‑sharing that matter to campaigns.
By the numbers:
- 3 majors aligned: Spotify now has fresh multi‑year recorded‑music deals with UMG, WMG, and Sony; publishing is where the direct U.S. pivot is accelerating.
- $230M: Estimated first‑year hit to U.S. publishing royalties tied to Spotify’s “bundling” move, according to publisher groups—context for why direct deals matter.
- Hundreds of millions: Annual U.S. mechanical payouts that are sensitive to how “revenue” and “bundles” are defined—direct licensing can negotiate this explicitly.
- Scale: Spotify paid $10B+ to rightsholders in 2024; even small percentage moves materially change songwriter checks.
Between the lines:
Direct U.S. licensing lets Sony and Spotify tailor superfan economics—from collectible audio‑visual SKUs to premium tiers—without waiting on CRB cycles. Expect SKU‑level experimentation (exclusive mixes, stems, hi‑res, fan club perks) tied to fan ID and CRM integrations.
Data access typically gets better in direct arrangements. That can surface campaign‑grade metrics (save‑rates, skip curves, merch click‑throughs) faster for labels, publishers, and managers. The knock‑on effect: tighter creative testing and more precise ad retargeting on Meta, YouTube, and Google.
Yes, there’s risk: direct deals may fragment terms across publishers, adding legal overhead for distributors and DIY artists. But for frontline releases with real budgets, the speed and flexibility can outweigh the complexity.
What’s next:
- Songwriter economics: Watch for minimum guarantees and uplift clauses tied to new tiers; some publishers will push for floor rates plus growth kickers.
- Product cadence: Expect faster rollout of superfan subscriptions, hi‑res audio, and enhanced albums aligned to tentpole releases.
- Deal copycats: Large indies and other publishers could pursue direct U.S. licenses, especially where bundling disputes or reporting granularity are pain points.
- Marketing playbook: Build pre‑saves and smart‑links that capture fan IDs and map to new Spotify SKUs (exclusive tracks, video editions, fan drops). The winners will wire this data back into ads and CRM in near‑real time.
The bottom line:
Spotify’s direct U.S. publishing pact with Sony moves the industry toward negotiated song deals and away from statutory defaults. For marketers, that means faster feature launches, better data, and new revenue SKUs to test—especially for superfans.




